Feminism justified female victim power by convincing the world that we lived in a sexist, male-dominated, and patriarchal world.

So long as you create laws that define women as victims, as creatures that demand protection, that need bodyguards, you are going to perpetuate the very worst of our sexist past.

Falling in love is biologically natural; sustaining love is biologically un-natural. Sustaining love requires a learned discipline. The discipline of love. The discipline of understanding our partner. (I've never heard someone say I want a divorce - my partner understands me.)

Nobody has said to men, It is OK if you want to be a full-time dad; find a woman who will support you.

And we reduce almost all male-female problems by working on both the female and the male. And that usually means having both sexes take responsibility.

In fact, the socialization gives us the tools to fill our evolutionary roles. They are our building blocks.

I am a men's liberationist (or "masculist") when men's liberation is defined as equal opportunity and equal responsibility for both sexes. I am a feminist when feminism favors equal opportunities and responsibilities for both sexes. I oppose both movements when either says our sex is THE oppressed sex, therefore, "we deserve rights." That's not gender liberation but gender entitlement. Ultimately, I am in favor of neither a women's movement nor a men's movement but a gender transition movement.