But if science may be said to be blind without philosophy, it is true also that philosophy is virtually empty without science.

Bertrand Russell would not have wished to be called a saint of any description; but he was a great and good man.

While moral rules may be propounded by authority the fact that these were so propounded would not validate them.

There is philosophy, which is about conceptual analysis - about the meaning of what we say - and there is all of this ... all of life.

But if science may be said to be blind without philosophy, it is true also that philosophy is virtually empty without science.

No moral system can rest solely on authority.

Why should you mind being wrong if someone can show you that you are?