Rights are not self-evident. They're not unalienable. They are subject to modification just like anything else.

All sides in a trial want to hide at least some of the truth.

The judge also has a truth he wants to hide: He often hasn't been completely candid in describing the facts or the law.

Foolish liberals who are trying to read the Second Amendment out of the constitution by claiming it's not an individual right or that it's too much of a safety hazard don't see the danger of the big picture. They're courting disaster by encouraging others to use this same means to eliminate portions of the Constitution they don't like.

The law is agnostic about truth.

I'm not a single-issue person, but I spend so much time on Israel because it is so unfairly condemned around the world.

A criminal trial is never about seeking justice for the victim. If it were, there could be only one verdict: guilty.