Every reader gets something different from a book and every reader, in a sense, completes it in a different way.

I think e-mail is representative of our fast food mentality in the United States, where everything has gotten faster and faster, and we're required to respond to inputs more quickly with less time for thought and reflection. I believe that we need to slow down.

-But rational thoughts lead only to rational thoughts, whereas irrational thoughts lead to new experiences.

Suppose time is a circle, bending back on itself. The world repeats itself, precisely, endlessly.

In fiction writing, I would say there are several different strands that have been woven through my own writing, and each influenced by a different group of writers.

In this acausal world, scientists are helpless. Their predictions become postdictions- Their equations become justifications, their logic, illogic. Scientists turn reckless and mutter like gamblers who cannot stop betting. Scientists are buffoons, not because they are rational but because the cosmos is irrational. Or perhaps it is not because the cosmos is irrational but because they are rational. Who can say which, in an acausal world?

I have for a long time loved fabulist, imaginative fiction, such as the writing of Italo Calvino, Jose Saramago, Michael Bulgakov, and Salman Rushdie. I also like the magic realist writers, such as Borges and Marquez, and feel that interesting truths can be learned about our world by exploring highly distorted worlds.