Mathematical reasoning may be regarded.

Instruction tables will have to be made up by mathematicians with computing experience and perhaps a certain puzzle-solving ability. There need be no real danger of it ever becoming a drudge, for any processes that are quite mechanical may be turned over to the machine itself.

Programming is a skill best acquired by practice and example rather than from books.

Machines take me by surprise with great frequency.

One day ladies will take their computers for walks in the park and tell each other, "My little computer said such a funny thing this morning".

Unless in communicating with it one says exactly what one means, trouble is bound to result.

I am not very impressed with theological arguments whatever they may be used to support. Such arguments have often been found unsatisfactory in the past. In the time of Galileo it was argued that the texts, 'And the sun stood still... and hasted not to go down about a whole day' (Joshua x. 13) and 'He laid the foundations of the earth, that it should not move at any time' (Psalm cv. 5) were an adequate refutation of the Copernican theory.