I know that it is a hopeless undertaking to debate about fundamental value judgements. For instance, if someone approves, as a goal, the extirpation of the human race from the earth, one cannot refute such a viewpoint on rational grounds. But if there is agreement on certain goals and values, one can argue rationally about the means by which these objectives may be obtained.

Do you remember how electrical currents and 'unseen waves' were laughed at? The knowledge about man is still in its infancy.

One must not attempt to justify them, but rather to sense their nature simply and clearly.

A table, a chair, a bowl of fruit and a violin; what else does a man need to be happy.

The real problem is in the hearts and minds of men. It is not a problem of physics but of ethics. It is easier to denature plutonium than to denature the evil spirit of man.

We dance for laughter, we dance for tears, we dance for madness, we dance for fears, we dance for hopes, we dance for screams, we are the dancers, we create the dreams.

Jesus is too colossal for the pen of phrasemongers, however artful. No man can dispose of Christianity with a bon mot