If you can imagine a thing, conjure it up in space then you can make it... The universe is real but you can't see it. You have to imagine it. Then you can be realistic about reproducing it.

To most people who look at a mobile, it's no more than a series of flat objects that move. To a few, though, it may be poetry.

My whole theory about art is the disparity that exists between form, masses and movement.

The universe is real, but you can't see it. You have to imagine it.

That others grasp what I have in mind seems unessential, at least as long as they have something else in theirs.

Above all, art should be fun.

Why must art be static? You look at an abstraction, sculptured or painted, an entirely exciting arrangement of planes, spheres, nuclei, entirely without meaning. It would be perfect but it is always still. The next step in sculpture is motion.