Different ‘philosophies’ represent nothing but methods of evaluation, which may lead to empirical mis-evaluation if science and empirical facts are disregarded.

Man's achievements rest upon the use of symbols.... we must consider ourselves as a symbolic, semantic class of life, and those who rule the symbols, rule us.

It seems evident that everything which exists in nature, is natural, no matter how simple or complicated a phenomenon it is; and on no occasion can the so-called 'supernatural' be anything else than a completely natural law, though it may, at the moment, be above and beyond the present understanding.

Who rules our symbols, rules us.

Identification makes general sanity and complete adjustment impossible. Training in non-identity plays a therapeutic role with adults.

The present non-aristotelian system is based on fundamental negative premises; namely, the complete denial of 'identity.'

I want to make clear only that words are not the things spoken about, and that there is no such thing as an object in absolute isolation.