I have found after 1.d4 there are more opportunities for richer play.

No, no, it is obvious that the ECU should act as a close alliance for the benefit of chess.

I still remember Botvinnik's reaction to each of my games, right from the opening moves. At first he would express amazement, then annoyance, and, finally irritation.

It is dangerous to maintain equality at the cost of placing the pieces passively.

First of all, we have to go back to the classical time control.

By all means examine the games of the great chess players, but don't swallow them whole. Their games are valuable not for their separate moves, but for their vision of chess, their way of thinking.

Style? I have no style.