I don't see a difference between playing a performance capture role and a live action role, they're just characters to me at the end of the day and I'm an actor who wants to explore those characters in fantastically written scripts. The only caveat is a good story is a good character.

I'd like to think that we strive in film and theatre to tell great stories, and I believe in the power of storytelling in our culture.

A lot of actors on film sets... very often they're not paying attention to the physical world around them. I think through studying art, I've always had that awareness and that's something that I've wanted to bring in to go beyond acting... As a form of expression, they are intrinsically linked.

The wonderful thing about 48 fps is the integration of live action and CG elements; that is something I learned from 'The Hobbit.' We are so used to 24 fps and the romance of celluloid but at 48 fps, you cannot deny the existence of these CG creations in the same time frame and space and environment as the live action.

That's what I think is the biggest challenge, is just being still and learning how to just be present in that stillness and not over do it, not over act.

As long as you have the acting chops and the desire to get inside a character, you can play anything.

Playing a character in a video game is different to other performances because your character can't lead the audience of players in one direction.