Scalia said the court had pretty much signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda, adding: Let me be clear that I have nothing against homosexuals, or any other group, promoting their agenda through normal democratic means.

I think the main fight is to dissuade Americans from what the secularists are trying to persuade them to be true: that the separation of church and state means that the government cannot favor religion over nonreligion.

The Constitution does not trust judges to make determinations of criminal guilt.

This is an execution, not surgery. Where does that come from, that you must find the method of execution that causes the least pain?

The court's job is to uphold the Constitution and you don't call that off in times of crisis. Would the framers have allowed this practice?

Rather than rewriting the law under the pretense of interpreting it, the Court should have left it to Congress to decide what to do about the Act's limitation of tax credits to state Exchanges.

Interior decorating is a rock-hard science compared to psychology practiced by amateurs.