The Constitution does not trust judges to make determinations of criminal guilt.

It would be gross understatement to say that the Telecommunications Act of 1996 is not a model of clarity. It is in many important respects a model of ambiguity or indeed even self-contradiction.

With respect to public acknowledgment of religious belief, it is entirely clear from our nation's historical practices that the Establishment Clause permits this disregard of polytheists and believers in unconcerned deities, just as it permits the disregard of devout atheists.

But I also believe that a lot of gun owners would agree that AK-47s belong in the hands of soldiers, not on the streets of our cities.

Words no longer have meaning if an Exchange that is not established by a State is "established by the State".

A law can be both economic folly and constitutional.

Words have meaning. And their meaning doesn't change.