More importantly, the Court forgets that ours is a government of laws and not of men. That means we are governed by the terms of our laws, not by the unenacted will of our lawmakers. 'If Congress enacted into law something different from what it intended, then it should amend the statute to conform to its intent.' In the meantime, this Court 'has no roving license ... to disregard clear language simply on the view that ... Congress 'must have intended' something broader.

The principal purpose of stare decisis is to protect reliance interest and further stability in the law.

The right of parents to direct the upbringing of their children is among the unalienable rights with which the Declaration of Independence proclaims 'all Men are endowed by their Creator.'

Certainly one cannot ban cross burning in the sanctity of his bedroom.

Day by day, case by case, the Supreme Court is busy designing a Constitution for a country I do not recognize.

Is it really so easy to determine that smacking someone in the face to find out where he has hidden the bomb that is about to blow up Los Angeles is prohibited by the Constitution?

A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless.