If we cannot have moral feelings against homosexuality, can we have it against murder? Can we have it against other things?

The wise do not investigate such silliness.

With respect to public acknowledgment of religious belief, it is entirely clear from our nation's historical practices that the Establishment Clause permits this disregard of polytheists and believers in unconcerned deities, just as it permits the disregard of devout atheists.

What is a moderate interpretation of the text? Halfway between what it really means and what you'd like it to mean?

[International law] doesn't show what the Constitution originally meant, and it doesn't show what is fundamentally important to Americans today. It shows what's fundamentally important to somebody else today.

I even accept for the sake of argument that sexual orgies eliminate social tensions and ought to be encouraged.

Interior decorating is a rock-hard science compared to psychology practiced by amateurs.