If we cannot have moral feelings against homosexuality, can we have it against murder? Can we have it against other things?

A law can be both economic folly and constitutional.

This is so absurd that it has, to my knowledge, never been contemplated.

A search is a search, even if it happens to disclose nothing but the bottom of a turntable.

Words no longer have meaning if an Exchange that is not established by a State is "established by the State".

What is a moderate interpretation of the text? Halfway between what it really means and what you'd like it to mean?

A Bill of Rights that means what the majority wants it to mean is worthless.