I think it's outrageous if a historian has a 'leading thought' because it means they will select their material according to their thesis

I think one of the great disasters (in military history) is the way that the Second World War has become the defining reference point for every crisis and every conflict.

The British bombing of Caen beginning on D-Day in particular was stupid, counter-productive and above all very close to a war crime.

When I was younger I used to get my best writing done at night, but now it has to be during the day. I usually finish work at half past seven, then go back to the house to open a bottle of wine, have dinner, and then read or watch television.

The blurring of fact and fiction has great commercial potential, which is bound to be corrupting in historical terms.

I believe passionately in preemptive pessimism, especially before a book comes out. I expect the worst both from reviewers and sales, and then, with any luck, I may be proved wrong.

I joined the Army in 1965 and served with the 11th Hussars, which I loved. The regiment was so relaxed - a salute was more like a friendly wave.