The press secretary who starts to narrow down or close the president's options because he answers delicate negotiating questions no longer serves the president.

There is something democratic about grass-roots, widespread money support. There is something anti-democratic about one person propping up a candidate who can't make it.

Why then would people look to the United Nations as an instrument of peace, if instead all it is, is an instrument of putting out declarations that nobody intends to take seriously anyway?

I think the burden is on those people who think he didn't have weapons of mass destruction to tell the world where they are.

Anytime James Carville, Paul Begala and David Axelrod hold hands and jump for joy, it's worth pondering how to turn their joy into tears.

The president of the United States and the secretary of defense would not assert as plainly and bluntly as they have that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction if it was not true, and if they did not have a solid basis for saying it.

I get a kick out of Democrats thinking they know how handicap a GOP race.