For the truth of the conclusions of physical science, observation is the supreme Court of Appeal.

Don't believe the results of experiments until they're confirmed by theory.

The understanding between a non-technical writer and his reader is that he shall talk more or less like a human being and not like an Act of Parliament. I take it that the aim of such books must be to convey exact thought in inexact language... he can never succeed without the co-operation of the reader.

The idea of a universal mind or Logos would be, I think, a fairly plausible inference from the present state of scientific theory.

Schrödinger's wave-mechanics is not a physical theory, but a dodge - and a very good dodge too.

I don't believe any experiment until it is confirmed by theory. I find this is a witty inversion of "conventional" wisdom.

The electron, as it leaves the atom, crystallises out of Schrodinger's mist like a genie emerging from his bottle.