I think, therefore I'll think.

Every aspect of Western culture needs a new code of ethics - a rational ethics - as a precondition of rebirth.

Don't worry. They're all against me. But I have one advantage: they don't know what they want. I do.

A morality that holds need as a claim, holds emptiness-non-existence-as its standard of value; it rewards an absence, a defect: weakness, inability, incompetence, suffering, disease, disaster, the lack, the fault, the flaw-the zero.

I can accept anything, except what seems to be the easiest for most people: the half-way, the almost, the just-about, the in-between.

The majority of those who are loosely identified by the term 'liberals' are afraid to let themselves discover that what they advocate is statism. They want to keep all the advantages and effects of capitalism, while destroying the cause, and they want to establish statism without its necessary effects. They do not want to know or to admit that they are the champions of dictatorship and slavery.

This is the age othe common man, they tell us-a title which any man may claim to the extent osuch distinction as he has managed not to achieve.