I guess the underlying principle might be, don't make it too easy for them to stereotype you.

We couldn't outspend the fossil fuel industry - they have more money than God.

All the science in the last few years, or almost all of it, really serves to show that the [climate] effects are larger and more rapid than we had thought even a decade ago.

We spend a lot of time playing defence against bad things. So, in the US, one of the focusses has been this huge Keystone Pipeline project, another has been the coal ports on the Pacific Ocean.

Our weird problem is an abundance of resources and a shortage of hard economic reasons not to use them.

Alone among businesses, the fossil-fuel industry is allowed to dump its main waste, carbon dioxide, for free.

You think OWS is radical? You think 350.org was radical for helping organize mass civil disobedience in D.C. in August against the Keystone Pipeline? We're not radical. Radicals work for oil companies. The CEO of Exxon gets up every morning and goes to work changing the chemical composition of the atmosphere. No one has ever done anything as radical as that, not in all of human history.