The world's going to change climatically. We just want to control the change. We want to have a high quality of life for billions of people as we pass through this era.

I don't perceive an anti-religious agenda, especially with regard to Christians and Christianity.

I like to regard myself as someone who's capable of critical thought, that is to say, who can evaluate claims.

My father was a very good Boy Scout. He was very skilled with knots, and he showed me how to tie a bow tie.

The future of commerce is going to be all electronic. The gold standard was a fine idea, but electronic changes of funds and credits will be the future.

I don't perceive an anti-religious agenda, especially with regard to Christians and Christianity. The issue being debated was creationism, the idea that the Earth is 6,000 years old. As I understand it, this involves the Bible's Old Testament exclusively.

When we see the shadow on our images, are we seeing the time 11 minutes ago on Mars? Or are we seeing the time on Mars as observed from Earth now? It's like time travel problems in science fiction. When is now; when was then?