Any verbose and tedious solution is error-prone because programmers get bored.

Personally, I look forward to better tools for analyzing C++ source code.

And no, I'm not a walking C++ dictionary. I do not keep every technical detail in my head at all times. If I did that, I would be a much poorer programmer. I do keep the main points straight in my head most of the time, and I do know where to find the details when I need them.

Too many managers and executives try to reduce programming to a low-level assembly-line activity. That's inefficient, wasteful, costly in the long run, and inhumane to programmers.

It's easy to win forgiveness for being wrong; being right is what gets you into real trouble.

Clearly, I reject the view that there is one way that is right for everyone and for every problem.

There's an old story about the person who wished his computer were as easy to use as his telephone. That wish has come true, since I no longer know how to use my telephone.