I don't think it's useful for somebody to argue with reviews.

I give lectures for money, but all the money goes to charity. So, I make no money from it.

Suppose Watergate had not been uncovered? I'd still be on the City Desk.

Because of Watergate in part, I am kind of a magnet for calls and information and suggestions.

I deal with first-hand sources. And give the people, even John Sununu, the opportunity to respond to what I've been told by first-hand sources.

I think journalism gets measured by the quality of information it presents, not the drama or the pyrotechnics associated with us.

It would seem that the Watergate story from beginning to end could be used as a primer on the American political system.