Now the guy that got to the top, the CEO, would obviously be stupid to have a number two guy who was a lot smarter than he is. So by definition, since he's a survivor and he got to the top and he isn't that brilliant, his number two guy is going to always be a little worse than he is. So, as time goes on, it's anti-Darwinism, the survival of the un- fittest.

Anyone that makes me a quarter of a billion dollars, I like.

I believe there are and will be major opportunities to enhance Time Warner's value in future combinations.

I have to look out for the shareholder’s interests, and I’m the largest shareholder.

Don't confuse luck with skill when judging others, and especially when judging yourself.

Im a cynic about corporate democracy and boards.

We're not about liquidating companies, but if you do that, why is that terrible? We're not blowing up the factories. The person who buys it should be able to make the asset more productive.