In not having an appointment at Harvard, I'm in the company of a great many people whose work I admire tremendously, in particular women of color.

So the idea that there is nothing essential, in the sense that there are no human universals, is dogma. Ask most anyone who is going to be shot at dawn.

It's mainly a few elite women who benefit greatly from standing with the forces that keep women down.

Can postmodernism hold the perpetrators of genocide accountable?

In my opinion, no feminism worthy of the name is not methodologically post-marxist.

Women are socially disadvantaged in controlling sexual access to their bodies through socialization to customs that define a woman's body as for sexual use by men. Sexual access is regularly forced or pressured or routinized beyond denial.

Feminism, Socialism, and Communism are one in the same, and Socialist/Communist government is the goal of feminism.