In its report, the Cox Committee concludes that China is using stolen U.S. design information to speed up its deployment of a new nuclear missile force.

Why did the Clinton Administration continue to liberalize export controls on sensitive technologies even after it learned that China had stolen designs?

The United States government first learned of the diversion of the W-88 nuclear warhead design in late 1995.

There are things I want to get done, and If I can reconnect where I was before, working on the issues I'm interested in, that's exciting to me.

Since 1998, the Administration has begun to upgrade counterintelligence and security at U.S. weapons labs.

There is a difference between strategic or technical default and default where you really don't have the economy to support the spending. We are not at that point yet. We could be. We could be, like some European nations.

What are the implications of a China that may be on nuclear parity with the United States?