We reject creationism because there is no evidence to support it. By contrast, the notion that biology is at least partially the basis of gender is an empirically supportable, and even well-supported, proposition. The gender scholars reject it on ideological, not evidentiary, grounds.

"Marginalized others" have access to other ways of knowing, and therefore to deeper, more authentic truths about human reality. They can share that knowledge by speaking about their lived experience while in a safe space. But to provide this kind of safety, members of privileged groups, i.e. white, able-bodied, cis-gendered middle class men, must keep quiet.

We are turning against boys and forgetting a simple truth: that the energy, competitiveness, and corporal daring of normal, decent males is responsible for much of what is right in the world.

In reality, American girls are among the most outspoken, ambitious, successful girls in the history of the human race.

Women are not children. We are not fragile little birds who can't cope with jokes, works of art, or controversial speakers.

Girls are more academically powerful. They make the grades, they run the student activities, they are the valedictorians.

Trigger warnings and safe spaces are an infantilizing setback for feminism - and for women.