We reject creationism because there is no evidence to support it. By contrast, the notion that biology is at least partially the basis of gender is an empirically supportable, and even well-supported, proposition. The gender scholars reject it on ideological, not evidentiary, grounds.

In reality, American girls are among the most outspoken, ambitious, successful girls in the history of the human race.

Boy's natural play is rough and tumble play, it's the universal play of little boys. And it's very different from aggression. And we are a society that's failing to understand the distinction.

A fair and just society offers equality of opportunity to all. But it cannot promise, and should not try to enforce, sameness.

I'm concerned that boys have become politically incorrect, that we are a society in the process of turning against its male children.

Hillary Clinton appears to believe in a form of stoicism - which is a tried and true life philosophy.

It's good to raise awareness that men and boys are struggling, at least many of them are. But why say men are finished? It's too harsh, too sweeping, and it happens to not be true.