Every film should have its own world, a logic and feel to it that expands beyond the exact image that the audience is seeing.

When you play a videogame, you could be a completely different person than you are in the real world, certain aspects of the way your brain works can be leveraged for something you could never do in the real world.

Every film should have its own world, a logic and feel to it that expands beyond the exact image that the audience is seeing.

I like films that don't have that unonimity of a response; that don't have consensus in the audience. What it is essentially for me is that if you go back and watch the film a second time, do you feel that you've been played fair with? Are all the clues in place? Indeed, sometimes these things are even overstated. Specifically, for that reason.

I think there are advantages to different scales of filmmaking. You wouldn't want to do just one thing.

I'm very happy where 3-D is going, which is that it's becoming a choice - and thankfully, most people are still choosing 2-D.

The real truth of that is that much as you want to believe that it's you being on top of everything, you're actually relying massively on the people around you.