I'm writing a review of three books on feminism and science, and it's about social constructionism. So I would say I'm a social constructionist, whatever that means

I agree with Chomsky in almost nothing. When it comes to innate structures and so on, I'm very skeptical

I think the perception of there being a deep gulf between science and the humanities is false

I think what's known about neurology is still scattered and uncertain

I think feminism has had a major impact on anthropology

Learning to exist in a world quite different from that which formed you is the condition, these days, of pursuing research you can on balance believe in and write sentences you can more or less live with.

I don't feel that an atmosphere of debate and total disagreement and argument is such a bad thing. It makes for a vital and alive field.