Am I right in saying that the locust of this problem is simply that judges in America are half political animals and half oracular demigods?

Even Merrick Garland can't get up and give a press conference in which he says, "Give me a damn vote." We just hear silence.

We don't care what the framers would have thought of violent video games. Times are changing.

A lot of conservative writers have twisted that argument in the conversation around Judge [Gonzalo] Curiel and said this is identity politics as played by liberals. And that I think what they're trying to say is that progressives are the first to say.

The Framers were no more interested in binding future Americans to a set of divinely inspired commandments than any of us would wish to be bound by them.

The fact that the Constitution is sufficiently open-ended to infuriate all Americans almost equally is part of its enduring genius.

On a court full of great writers, I shouldn't say full of - there have been some bad writers on the court over the years.