It is partly the absence of recorded history which sends women now to the lives of women past for the detailed documentation of their daily lives.

For centuries women have been saying many of the things we are saying today and which we have often thought of as new.

There is a real split today between those who push the button and those who do the dying.

men have been in charge of according value to literature, and ... they have found the contributions of their own sex immeasurably superior.

what has been termed 'correct' English is nothing other than the blatant legitimation of the white middle-class code.

men have their cake and get to eat it too, for while they decree themselves as representative of humanity, women who argue that men are not, are simply showing how little they know! And when men's standards are defined as human standards, then women who assert that women are different, demonstrate how 'inhuman' they are. It is a real 'Catch 22.

Well into the 19th century there were pronouncements from just about every branch of science and medicine that reading, writing, and thinking were dangerous for women. Articles in the Lancet declared that women's brains would burst and their uteruses atrophy if they engaged in any form of rigorous thinking. The famous physician J.D. Kellogg insisted that novel reading was the greatest cause of uterine disease among young women and urged parents to protect their daughters from the dreaded consequences of print.