The notion of a separate organism is clearly an abstraction, as is also its boundary. Underlying all this is unbroken wholeness even though our civilization has developed in such a way as to strongly emphasize the separation into parts.

Can we learn to become more learning-oriented individually and collectively, rather than 'I know' oriented?

Then there is the further question of what is the relationship of thinking to reality. As careful attention shows, thought itself is in an actual process of movement. That is to say, one can feel a sense of flow in the stream of consciousness not dissimilar to the sense of flow in the movement of matter in general. May not thought itself thus be a part of reality as a whole? But then, what could it mean for one part of reality to 'know' another, and to what extent would this be possible?

To change your reality you have to change your inner thoughts.

What is needed is to learn afresh, to observe, and to discover for ourselves the meaning of wholeness.

Perhaps there is more sense in our nonsense and more nonsense in our 'sense' than we would care to believe.

If we can be cheered up by positive images we can be depressed by negative ones. As long as we accept images as realities we are in that trap, because you can't control the images.