The school asks a person who has achieved a certain level of career success to give you a speech telling you that career success is not important.

We know the 65-point policy points, to the extent that they exist, but is Hillary Clinton willing to be vulnerable, is she willing to be funny, is she willing to be both authoritative, but also real? And so less what she says than the emotional tone she sets. It takes a lot of confidence to be a vulnerable speaker on this stage. And sometimes she hasn't always projected the confidence it takes to be in some ways weak. But that's what I think people were looking for, that moment of human connection.

If you know that most processing is below the level of awareness, you learn the value of sleep. You're brain is working on the problem anyway.

If it's all win-loss, then you do whatever you can to win and to make money and to beat the deal.

People want reality that tells them how right they are all the time.

On the [Andrew] Puzder point, I do agree there has been a double standard.

Recovering from suffering is not like recovering from a disease. Many people don’t come out healed; they come out different. They crash through the logic of individual utility and behave paradoxically. Instead of recoiling from the sorts of loving commitments that almost always involve suffering, they throw themselves more deeply into them. Even while experiencing the worst and most lacerating consequences, some people double down on vulnerability. They hurl themselves deeper and gratefully into their art, loved ones and commitments.