What sets imperialism of the capitalist sort apart from other conceptions of empire is that it is the capitalist logic that typically dominates, though ... there are times in which the territorial logic comes to the fore. But this then poses a crucial question: how can the territorial logics of power, which tend to be awkwardly fixed in space, respond to the open spatial dynamics of endless capital accumulation? And what does endless capital accumulation imply for the territorial logics of power?

The main substantive achievement of neoliberalism has been to redistribute rather than to generate wealth and income.

Money must exist before it can be turned into capital.

Individual capitalists, in short, necessarily act in such a way as to de-stabilize capitalism.

Marx set out to resolve the contradictions and to correct the errors in classical political economy. In this he thought he had succeeded very well. Judging by the sound and the fury of the controversy surrounding his interpretations, he either succeeded too well or deluded himself to the success of his enterprise.

The equilibrium between supply and demand is achieved only through a reaction against the upsetting of the equilibrium.

All rent is based on the monopoly power of private owners of certain portions of the globe.