I think cubism has not fully been developed. It is treated like a style, pigeonholed and that's it.

The problem is, photographic dyes and printing inks aren't as good as paint, actually.

All art is contemporary, if it's alive, and if it's not alive, what's the point of it?

West Yorkshire is quite dramatic and beautiful, the crags and things.

Photography hankers after the condition of the neutral observer. But there can be no such things as a neutral observer. For something to be seen, it must be looked at by somebody, and any true and real depiction must be an account of the experience of that looking.

It's all right if you don't mind looking at the world from the point of view of a paralyzed Cyclops—for a split second.

I've always said that the only thing a photograph is good at capturing faithfully is another flat surface.