Is the minor convenience of allowing the present generation the luxury of doubling its energy consumption every 10 years worth the major hazard of exposing the next 20,000 generations to this lethal waste?

All I know about thermal pollution is that if we continue our present rate of growth in electrical energy consumption it will simply take, by the year 2000, all our freshwater streams to cool the generators and reactors.

We need the sea. We need a place to stand and touch and listen - to feel the pusle of the world as the surf rolls in.

True wilderness is where you keep it, and real wilderness experience cannot be a sedentary one; you have to seek it out not seated, but afoot.

Apollo 13, as you may remember, gave us a reactor that is bubbling away right now somewhere in the Pacific. It's supposed to be bubbling away on the moon, but it's in the Pacific Ocean instead.

Realistic' is a loaded word for me. Anyone who uses the word 'realistic' is all bad.

Once we open the door to the plutonium economy, we expose ourselves to absolutely terrible, horrifying risks from these people.