Where people are using phones in rural areas their risk of brain cancer is higher than in urban areas.

Radar, of course, is what cellphone radiation is exactly like. It can be a similar frequency, it's just much weaker power.

Brain cancer has a latency in the population of 40 years.

The reality is, cellphones have to be used safely. They are today like cars and trucks - we can't live without them, but we certainly wouldn't give a car or truck to a toddler to drive. Why are we thinking it's perfectly okay to give a device that the World Health Organization has said is a "possible human carcinogen" to infants and toddlers, and for that matter, schoolchildren?

Where people are using phones in rural areas their risk of brain cancer is higher than in urban areas.

Cellphone and other wireless radiation should be classified as a "probable human carcinogen."

It's true that non-ionizing radiation lacks the power to have damage. But its damage seems to come from its modulated signal. So every 900 milliseconds, if you have a cellphone in your pocket, it's getting half of that radiation which is getting into you as it seeks the signal from the tower.