The government should set a goal for a clean environment but not mandate how that goal should be implemented.

The government should set a goal for a clean environment but not mandate how that goal should be implemented.

We need to ask our policy makers and those we elect to office who are supposed to make decisions to give us the evidence of the facts that are behind the decisions that we make. We should be skeptical.

The reality is that zero defects in products plus zero pollution plus zero risk on the job is equivalent to maximum growth of government plus zero economic growth plus runaway inflation.

A nuclear-power plant is infinitely safer than eating, because 300 people choke to death on food every year.

The objective, clearly enunciated by the leaders of UNCED, is to bring about a change in the present system of independent nations. The future is to be World Government with central planning by the United Nations. Fear of environmental crises - whether real or not - is expected to lead to - compliance

We shouldn't accept things just because somebody says so.