There is no reason why challenging themes and engaging stories have to be mutually exclusive - in fact, each can fuel the other. As a filmmaker, I want to entertain people first and foremost. If out of that comes a greater awareness and understanding of a time or a circumstance, then the hope is that change can happen.

You do these movies, you give it out to the world and you really have no idea how people are going to react to you.

I never thought about that ever throughout the entire course of my career about choosing a specific role because it would make me seem more man-like.

I think one of the privileges of being a filmmaker is the opportunity to remain a kind of perpetual student.

There is something universal in the theme of a man trying to save his family in the midst of the most terrible circumstances. It is not limited to Sierra Leone. This story could apply to any number of places where ordinary people have been caught up in political events beyond their control.

I don't think movies can ever be too intense, but people have to understand why you're showing them the things you are showing them.

And how deeply do I let business considerations affect [screenwriting] choices that might otherwise be more or less esthetic? . . . Do I choose the upbeat rather than the downer ending because I know it will score better at the preview? Can the idea be sold in a single sentence? Can it compete with space aliens and tornadoes and missions impossible?