The heart may think it knows better: the senses know that absence blots people out. We really have no absent friends. The friend becomes a traitor by breaking, however unwillingly or sadly, out of our own zone: a hard judgment is passed on him, for all the pleas of the heart.

Forgiveness should be an act, but this is a state with him.

Dialogue must appear realistic without being so. Actual realism-the lifting, as it were, of passages from a stenographer's take-down of a 'real life' conversation-would be disruptive. Of what? Of the illusion of the novel. In 'real life' everything is diluted; in the novel everything is condensed.

Love of privacy - perhaps because of the increasing exactions of society - has become in many people almost pathological.

Solitary and farouche people don't have relationships; they are quite unrelatable.

With three or more people there is something bold in the air: direct things get said which would frighten two people alone and conscious of each inch of their nearness to one another. To be three is to be in public - you feel safe.

Experience isn't interesting until it begins to repeat itself. In fact, till it does that, it hardly is experience.