Science "says" nothing. People say things and knowledge changes.

We are always in transition.

The way even movements change is stunning: Chinese communist capitalists? Evangelicals deciding to be nice to gay people?

Scientists and theologians can’t offer better than circular arguments, because there are no other kinds of arguments. Bible believers quote the Bible, and scientists quote other scientists. How do either scientists or theologians answer this question about the accuracy of their conclusions: “In reference to what?

Science "says" nothing. People say things and knowledge changes.

I think that the Democratic Party has been ill served by identity politics. I think that ironically evangelicals have now bought into the same mistake. They have discovered allies in the white supremacist movement. I think this is a heavy price to pay and will in the end accelerate the departure from religion by young people.

We have no outside point of view. We are nature too.