We cannot justify treating any sentient nonhuman as our property, as a resource, as a thing that we an use and kill for our purposes.

There is no moral distinction between fur and other materials made from animals, such as leather, which also is the result of the suffering and death of sentient beings.

We can no more justify using nonhumans as human resources than we can justify human slavery. Animal use and slavery have at least one important point in common: both institutions treat sentient beings exclusively as resources of others. That cannot be justified with respect to humans; it cannot be justified with respect to nonhumans—however “humanely” we treat them.

Any serious social, political, and economic change must include veganism.

Because animals are property, we consider as "humane treatment" that we would regard as torture if it were inflicted on humans.

It costs us so little to go vegan. It costs animals so much if we don't.

We should never present flesh as somehow morally distinguishable from dairy. To the extent it is morally wrong to eat flesh, it is as morally wrong - and possibly more morally wrong - to consume dairy