The Copernican revolution was actually a contribution to the life of the church, the development of our view of ourselves in terms of the Universe, and therefore our view of God, et cetera. But, that took centuries, and struggles, and conflicts before that happened.

If I have a fundamental belief that the universe is created by God, then I also come to the belief that that universe reflects God, it gives me some knowledge of Him. Obviously, therefore, the more I know of the universe is, the more enriched my limited knowledge of God is.

Science is and should be seen as "completely neutral" on the issue of the theistic or atheistic implications of scientific results.

People tend not to disassociate the technological issues from pure scientific research, so that science sometimes gets a bad name for things that science doesn't deserve having a bad name for.

Neither of us can come to either a knowledge of God, or a denial of God by our scientific research.

I don't use scientific data as a foundation for believing in God - I use it as an enrichment of my knowledge of God.

Christianity has always had sort of an ability to absorb the developments in science. But, it's always done it very slowly.