I strongly believe that marriage should be defined as between a man and a woman. I'm troubled by activist judges who are defining marriage. I've watched carefully what's happened in San Francisco where licenses were being issued, even though the law states otherwise. I have consistently stated that I will support law to protect marriage between a man and a woman. And obviously these events are influencing my decision.

Look, this is a man, he's got great numbers. He talks about numbers. I'm beginning to think not only did he invent the Internet, but he invented the calculator. It's fuzzy math. It's a scaring - trying to scare people in the voting booth. Under my tax plan, that he continues to criticize, I set a third - the federal government should take no more than a third of anybody's check.

You teach a child to read, and he or her will be able to pass a literacy test.

Government should do a few things, and do them right

I have a duty to protect the Executive Branch from legislative encroachment.

You subscribe politics to it. I subscribe freedom to it.

There ought to be limits to freedom. We're aware of the site, and this guy is just a garbage man.