Psychoanalysis was from the start, still is, and perhaps always will be a well-constituted church and a form of treatment based on a set of beliefs that only the very faithful could adhere to, i.e., those who believe in a security that amounts to being lost in the herd and defined in terms of common and external goals

As for being responsible or irresponsible, we don't recognize those notions, they're for policemen and courtroom psychiatrists.

Far from being a psychological trait, the spirit of revenge is the principle on which our whole psychology depends.

Only thought is capable of inventing the fiction of a State that is universal by right, of elevation the State to the level of de jure universality

I believe strongly that philosophy has nothing to do with specialists.

The fundamental problem of political philosophy is still precisely the one that Spinoza saw so clearly (and that Wilhelm Reich rediscovered): Why do men fight for their servitude as stubbornly as though it were their salvation?

To become imperceptible oneself, to have dismantled love in order to become capable of loving. To have dismantled one's self in order finally to be alone and meet the true double at the other end of the line. A clandestine passenger on a motionless voyage. To become like everybody else; but this, precisely, is a becoming only for one who knows how to be nobody, to no longer be anybody. To paint oneself gray on gray.