The domestic NSA-led Surveillance State which Frank Church so stridently warned about has obviously come to fruition. The way to avoid its grip is simply to acquiesce to the nation's most powerful factions, to obediently remain within the permitted boundaries of political discourse and activism. Accepting that bargain enables one to maintain the delusion of freedom - "he who does not move does not notice his chains," observed Rosa Luxemburg - but the true measure of political liberty is whether one is free to make a different choice.

History shows that the mere existence of a mass surveillance apparatus, regardless of how it is used, is in itself sufficient to stifle dissent. A citizenry that is aware of always being watched quickly becomes a compliant and fearful one.

For those suggesting criticisms of drone kills should wait until the election: that'd be reasonable if he stops killing until the election.

[I]f you want instant, reflexive support for the US government's police and military powers, MSNBC is the place to turn these days.

I don't have a 'side'—I'm responsible for what I say and nothing else.

He's the President—it's the responsibility of every citizen to criticize aggressively when they think it's warranted.

Many of the most important stories in the history of modern journalism have come from sources who have taken information without authorization.