There is no neutral ground when it comes to the tolerance question. Everybody has a point of view she thinks is right, and everybody passes judgment at some point or another. The Christian gets pigeonholed as the judgmental one, but everyone else is judging, too, even people who consider themselves relativists.

Everyone has a belief system in his or her mind, a story about the way they think the world actually is, even if they haven't thought about it much or worked out all the details.

I want people to see that Christianity claims to be true in the deep sense, and if it isn't, then it solves nothing at all.

Almost everyone agrees the world is not the way it ought to be. It's called the problem of evil.

Though it's hard to be completely certain about things like this, I have a suspicion that only someone with deep freedom (one who makes decisions for reasons that are his own) and who's also a moral being (can experience goodness) can have a meaningful friendship with God. If friendship with God and sharing in His happiness are good things (and it seems they are), then making a creature who could enjoy these things is also a good thing, even if it comes with a liability. There's a risk.

Evil did not catch God by surprise. He had a rescue plan, and He's still in the process of working out His plan.

If the unborn is a human person, no justification for abortion is adequate.