Creative thought must always contain a random component.

There is a strong tendency in explanatory prose to invoke quantities of tension, energy, and whatnot to explain the genesis of pattern. I believe that all such explanations are inappropriate or wrong.

After mastery comes artistry and not before.

Language commonly stresses only one side of any interaction.

In no system which shows mental characteristics can any part have unilateral control over the whole. In other words, the mental characteristics of the system are imminent, not in some part, but in the system as a whole.

We are discovering today that several of the premises which are deeply ingrained in our way of life are simply untrue and become pathogenic when implemented with modern technology.

What is the pattern that connects the crab to the lobster and the primrose to the orchid, and all of them to me, and me to you?