Photography appears to be an easy activity; in fact it is a varied and ambiguous process in which the only common denominator among its practitioners is in the instrument.

It's wonderful to be famous as long as you remain unknown.

Pictures, regardless of how they are created and recreated, are intended to be looked at. This brings to the forefront not the technology of imaging, which of course is important, but rather what we might call the eyenology (seeing).

Freedom for me is a strict frame, and inside that frame are all the variations possible.

One eye looks within, the other eye looks without.

What reinforces the content of a photograph is the sense of rhythm - the relationship between shapes and values.

Photography has not changed since its origin except in its technical aspects, which for me are not important.