Does anyone have any questions for my answers?

If you control the food, you control a nation. If you control the energy, you control a region. If you control the money, you control the world.

When I became security advisor, I became familiar with the so-called SIOP war plans, I called in Secretary McNamara and asked him what they were hiding from me, because I couldn't believe that the National policy would foresee such a level of destructiveness.

In the end, peace can be achieved only by hegemony or by balance of power.

Leaders are responsible not for running public opinion polls but for the consequences of their actions.

I believe that there is a whole set of issues in the world - environment, proliferation, energy, cyberspace - that can only be dealt with on a global basis. The traditional patterns of national rivalry and national competition are not suitable for those cases.

With respect to the relationship between nuclear weapons and the advent of détente, one has to consider two things. One, the nature of nuclear weapons in themselves, and secondly, the advent of nuclear parity.