In Asia, the nation state still is extremely vital, and of course, then in Africa, a whole new pattern is emerging because the states in Africa reflected the preferences of the colonial powers when they were established.

For the Soul of France is masterful history, brilliantly researched, and hard to put down.

A nation riven by factions, in which the minority has no hope of ever becoming a majority, or in which some group knows it is perpetually outcast, will seem oppressive to its members, whatever the legal pretensions.

It is not a matter of what is true that counts, but a matter of what is perceived to be true.

Does anyone have any questions for my answers?

I don't think that that's a desirable option for us. Besides, it wouldn't work, because there are too many other countries that are willing to work economically with China. But I don't think the basic relationship depends on economics. It depends on a political understanding of what is required for peace in Asia.

Henceforth the adequacy of any military establishment will be tested by its ability to preserve the peace.